Andras Forgacs, the speaker, suggested a plan of making leather andmeat without killing animals.
I think Andras showed us a revolutionary and marvelous idea. I agreehim for the most part. I have three reasons for this.
First, it is a method that doesn’t provoke ethical problems. Thereare a lot of people who don’t eat meat, particular meat or all types of meat, for religious and cultural reasons. Meat is a delicious food so Andras’s idea probably brings them happiess.
Second, it is an environmentally friendly method. The world’spopulation is growing so we need to maintain more and more animals. It creates a breeding ground for disease and opportunities for harm and abuse. At once diseases go around human, it may kill millions of people. The other problem which the enormous amount of animals provoke is the global warming. The global warming is a big problem that even embroils each country’s governments. We mustn’t increase the number of animals which are the big producers of greenhouse gases. Another problem is the animals use land, food, fresh water. Lack of such sources especially causes people in developing countries pain. Maintaining enormous amount of animals causes many problems so we need an alternative plan. And in fact, Andras’s plan is effective.
Finally, leather which can be made by his idea have desirablequalities. If we can make leather as we like, that’s a wonderful thing. And to begin with prevailing leather is effective to prevail the technology of making meat among the world.
ButI have a point to refer to the idea. We don’t need to be so much sensitive to kill animals. In our long history, we killed lots of animals and ate or wore them. And we kill not only cows or pigs but also fish. Isn’t it a bad thing? To live, killing animals is not a wrong way. (309 words)